Chick fil a first amendment controversy

He was within his rights to do so -- expressing his own opinion, both personally and as mayor. We want to do anything we possibly can to strengthen families. Retrieved 26 July Dardick, Hal July 25, Gay rights activists organized a "Kiss Off" to occur on August 3, [55] an event where LGBT individuals would show affection in public, [56] but it attracted smaller-than-hoped-for crowds.

It is pretty much the exact same argument. Upon being presented with petitions demanding that Berenstain Bears be pulled from a Chick-fil-A promotion, HarperCollins issued a statement saying "We have a long history of diversity and inclusiveness and work tirelessly to protect the freedom of expression.

A part of our corporate commitment is to be responsible stewards of all that God has entrusted to us. It was also true that Boston mayor Thomas M.

On Sunday, all Chick-fil-A stores close so workers can spend the day at worship and rest. The place is closed on Sundays, for crying out loud.

Is Chick-Fil-A directly discriminating against same-sex marriage? Truet Cathy founded a wonderful company who hires teenagers and pays their way to college. There is no black and white here.

In the July 2 story — picked up by the Baptist Press on July 16 — Cathy affirmed that his company backs the traditional family unit.

Chick-fil-A and Same-Sex Marriage

We are very much committed to that," Cathy emphasized. Are there regular gay customers of CFA who are not treated equally?

And Cathy had the right to express the support for traditional marriage as a corporate stance for Chick-fil-A. The mayors deserve big ugly dunce caps for their tough talk. This is not true. Is this about corporate responsibility? In case you need a reminder, the First Amendment reads in full: Local government reactions[ edit ] After these interviews, Thomas Meninothe Mayor of Bostonstated that he would not allow the company to open franchises in the city "unless they open up their policies.

I personally do agree with his argument. They have a position that gives them a platform to speak out, and be heard, on matters of public concern. He uses humor, because when readers who have not formed an opinion yet read his article, they will we subject to agree with his opinion.

Not in America, anyway.


Traditionally, that has meant getting involved in local churches. A mayor in a less enlightened city has a right to say that Chick-fil-A is especially welcome, just as he might want to say that Starbucks is not welcome because it gives benefits to same-sex couples.

Who We Are and has promised that its not-for-profit arm, WinShape, will not contribute money to groups that oppose gay marriage. History[ edit ] This reads like a regurgitated Press Release, down to the quotes, "We are not engaging.

Such groups oppose same-sex marriage. This is also about the right of Americans to support or protest a corporation based on the political views coming from its CEOs, presidents and other leaders. Are gays hired at CFA, from the highest to the lowest?Noah Michelson, editor of the Huffington post, is tired of the whole Chick-Fil-A/First Amendment controversy, and states that “If I hear one more person say that he or she is supporting Chick-fil-A because "This is a First Amendment issue," I'm going to jump out of one of the Huffington Post's fifth-floor windows and swan dive into oncoming.

Claim: Chick-fil-A has donated money to organizations that oppose same-sex Even the Boston Globe — oblivious to its own past reporting — believes the new Chick-fil-A controversy is a open-and-shut matter of respecting the First Amendment.

Here are the basic facts.

Chick-fil-A same-sex marriage controversy

Let's take a short quiz: The controversy over Chick-fil-A's president opposing gay marriage is a matter of: First Amendment rights Corporate.

The controversy over Chick-fil-A exposed the rampant anti-Christian bias and First Amendment double standard characteristic of liberal media.

The public battle over Chick-fil-A and its stance on same-sex marriage might have a good side effect: It’s raising public awareness of the First Amendment of the Constitution. But in the long run, the company could be in a pickle.

Chick fil a first amendment controversy
Rated 0/5 based on 12 review