The reform act of 1832 essay

The Reform Bill was again brought before the House of Commons, which agreed to the second reading by a large majority in July. Parliamentary boroughs in England ranged widely in size from small hamlets to large cities, partly because they had evolved haphazardly. Newbould, Ian, Whiggery and Reform, Stanford: The true middle class victory came later.

As a result of this Reform Act the political power slipped into the hands of the middle class in the towns and the rural area also. The march of the Blanketeers in is another great example to sum up the dissatisfaction. This idea of The reform act of 1832 essay can be seen through the re-adjustment of both county and borough seats, one specific aspect shows that 19 new boroughs with one MP would be created[4].

Every time there was a riot or a mass movement in England, Lord Liverpool believed that they all had the potential to spark a revolution and create similar scenes which were witnessed during the French Revolution in Ina large pro-reform rally was held in Birmingham. After the Acts of Union became law on 1 January the reason they are sometimes incorrectly referred to as a single Act of Unionthe unreformed House of Commons was composed of members, of whom represented England and Wales.

In the reformed Act, county seats and borough seats were both restructured in order to create a fairer representation of the British people in government. It is important to note that the idea of a victory is a very subjective one; a particular outcome of an event can only be judged a victory if it is a realisation of the aspirations of the affected parties.

However even though The reform act of 1832 essay aristocrats Tories were involved they were against any sort of reform, and believed that if Britain reformed revolution would come after. This topic I feel is very significant as it shows that despite all the efforts the King and the Whig government made to change the original system, it still had a number of loopholes within it.

In particular, the Seditious Meetings Act prohibited groups of more than 50 people from assembling to discuss any political subject without prior permission from the sheriff or magistrate.

All the adult people were not given the right of franchise. The smallest counties, Rutland and Angleseyhad fewer than 1, voters each, while the largest county, Yorkshirehad more than 20, They are our masters! Inthe Prime Minister proposed a reform bill, but the House of Commons rejected it on a — vote.

Still, as Rubinstein points out, that despite the common view that the middle classes rose to pre-eminence in the wake ofin many respects this view is surely misconceived. Macmillan,p. A group of Whigs led by James Maitland, 8th Earl of Lauderdale and Charles Grey founded an organisation advocating parliamentary reform in The leaders of the National Political Union ignored this proclamation, but leaders of the influential Birmingham branch decided to co-operate with the government by discouraging activities on a national level.

The regularity due to physical force in which revolution could have taken place. Some boroughs had a combination of these varying types of franchise, and most had special rules and exceptions, [12] so many boroughs had a form of franchise that was unique to themselves.

This simply was not the case; Wellington was losing trust from all areas, including the majority of his own party members and also the public, and the idea of reform was becoming extremely popular with many people.

Some noblemen even controlled multiple constituencies: He did nonetheless agree to some electoral reform; he disfranchised several small boroughs, granted representation to large towns such as Manchester and Leedsand increased the number of members elected by populous counties.

Real democracy was established in England after the Act of and the way to parliamentary reform was opened up. Having said that, it is possible to envisage circumstances where if the Bill had not been passed inthe middle and working classes could have become more unified, and gained more sweeping concessions at a future point.

This was a positive aspect as it showed signs of an improvement to the political system and that the government were working towards a well represented government. As soon as the new session began in Decemberthe Third Reform Bill was brought forward.

Expecting the worse was a wise thing to do as it allowed Lord Liverpool and his government to be a little more precautious in how they ran the country.The Reform Act, often referred to as the ‘Great’ Reform Act, is traditionally perceived in one of two main ways.

Firstly, the act can be viewed as an important, progressive step towards the establishment of Britain as a modern, democratic and representative state. Free Essay: The Passing of the Reform Act During the early part of the 19th Century reform was placed low on the political agenda.

This was perhaps due. The Reform Act of introduced some revolutionary changes in the representative system and franchise system of England. In the constitutional history of England, it proved to be an era of significance.

Tory members named it a revolutionary act because it shook up the roots of ancient conventions. The passing of the Reform Act (also knows as the 'Great Reform Act') and the consequent extension of the franchise was due to the culmination of several factors.

Short Essay on the Significance of Reform Act of 1832

Importance of the Reform Act Essay Words | 8 Pages To what extent was the Reform Act the most important development in politics and government between and (36) Overall, the Reform Act was a major development in politics and government between and ; however it was not the most important. Essay about Parliamentary Reform between and in Great Britain.

Reform Act 1832

There were many reasons why between and parliamentary reform became a big and unyielding issue on the political landscape.

The reform act of 1832 essay
Rated 3/5 based on 49 review