Which contemporary motivation theory would motivate you the most

Socio-cultural theory[ edit ] Sociocultural theory see Cultural-historical psychology also known as Social Motivation emphasizes impact of activity and actions mediated through social interaction, and within social contexts.

Phenomenologically, the pleasure from reading a good book is very different to the pleasure from bungee jumping, and both of these pleasures are very different to the pleasure of having sex.

Incentive theory distinguishes itself from other motivation theories, such as drive theory, in the direction of the motivation. Dissonance is also reduced by justifying, blaming, and denying. For both Nagel and Stroud, the thought seems to be that there is something in our philosophical quest for objectivity that inexorably leads us to skeptical conclusions.

That is why I am not in a position to take the sight of my hand as evidence for it. The anti-skeptical import of the basic hinge proposition line is thus moot. Most psychological theories hold that motivation exists purely within the individual, but socio-cultural theories express motivation as an outcome of participation in actions and activities within the cultural context of social groups.

Perhaps the least known disagreement about what aspects of pleasure make it valuable is the debate about whether we have to be conscious of pleasure for it to be valuable. This problem is meant to reflect the inadequacy of beliefs of one type - concerning immediate experience - at serving the purpose of epistemically supporting beliefs of another type - concerning material objects in the external world.

Compensation can be tangible or intangible, It helps in motivating the employees in their corporate life, students in academics and inspire to do more and more to achieve profitability in every field.

Austinhas been developed by Fred Dretske That the DeRose view differs in these ways from the views presented by Lewis and Cohen may work in its favour. Edward Craig ;for instance, has argued that the Dretske-Nozick proposal is either impotent at meeting skeptical arguments or unnecessary.

In the view of behaviorism, motivation is understood as a question about what factors cause, prevent, or withhold various behaviors, while the question of, for instance, conscious motives would be ignored. When Prudential Hedonists claim that happiness is what they value most, they intend happiness to be understood as a preponderance of pleasure over pain.

Not being able to compare different types of pleasure results in being unable to say if a life is better than another in most even vaguely realistic cases. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Val Kovalin and Obsidianbookshelf.

Admittedly, this belief will not track the truth in the nearest possible world in which she is a BIV, but since this possible world is far-off, this fact alone should not suffice on this construal of the RA thesis to undermine her knowledge. Pleasure is Not the Only Source of Intrinsic Value The most common argument against Prudential Hedonism is that pleasure is not the only thing that intrinsically contributes to well-being.

The problem with this strategy is that the more adjustments that are made, the more apparent it becomes that the definition of pleasure is not recognisable as the pleasure that gave Hedonism its distinctive intuitive plausibility in the first place.

Most attempts to define pleasure as liking or pro-attitudes seem to disagree with either the folk conception of what pleasure is or any of the plausible scientific conceptions of how pleasure functions. Maslow believed self-actualization could be measured through the concept of peak experiences.

Hedonistic Utilitarianism, Edinburgh University Press. The Williams line thus shares a central core of claims with the semantic contextualist view.

Contemporary Skepticism

With this condition in play, Dretske can get the result he wants. Physiological needs - these are biological requirements for human survival, e.Many of the differences in employee motivation, management styles, and organizational structures of companies throughout the world can be traced to differences in the collective mental programming of people in different national cultures.

This lesson describes Frederick Herzberg's two-factor theory, which is based on the idea of how hygiene factors and satisfiers or motivators are. Peopleimages/istock The incentive theory suggests that people are motivated to do things because of external rewards.

For example, you might be motivated to go to work each day for the monetary reward of being paid. Behavioral learning concepts such as association and reinforcement play an important role in this theory of motivation.

This theory shares some similarities with the behaviorist.

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs

Definition. The following definitions of motivation were gleaned from a variety of psychology textbooks and reflect the general consensus that motivation is an internal state or condition (sometimes described as a need, desire, or want) that serves to activate or energize behavior and give it direction (see Kleinginna and Kleinginna, a).

internal state or condition that activates behavior.


Buy Category Theory in Context (Aurora: Dover Modern Math Originals) on mint-body.com FREE SHIPPING on qualified orders. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) is a theory of motivation. It is concerned with supporting our natural or intrinsic tendencies to behave in effective and healthy ways.


SDT has been researched and practiced by a network of researchers around the world. The theory was initially developed by Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan, and has been elaborated and refined by scholars from many countries.

Which contemporary motivation theory would motivate you the most
Rated 3/5 based on 44 review